Detailed Notes on h4831sc load data
Detailed Notes on h4831sc load data
Blog Article
I'm a true supporter in the H4831 powder. I get wonderful velocity and accuracy from any caliber I have tried using it in. Through the twenty five-06 up on the 338 it really is my head over to powder of option. I test every type of powders when Doing the job up loads, nevertheless the H4831 normally appears to come out on prime for accuracy and velocity when the situation is of the 06 class or larger sized.
H4831 will do the job while in the Swift but not real properly. You'll never get the pressures you require for regularity Using the .223. 760, or H414 might be better but for a few motive I ain't the biggest admirer of most ball powders.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo generates .5MOA teams with velocity about 3020fps from a 26" barrel. I take advantage of this very same powder in my 300wm shooting 180gr drugs, so it's pleasant to possess a single powder for both of those.
We’d like to make certain you’re eighteen decades of age or older right before allowing for you to shop our website. Are you eighteen years of age or older?
Beginner to reloading. This will probably be used for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I had been ready to get my arms on a pair kilos of h4831.
I realize, rough times. H4831SC will certainly get the job done, I just didn't like the situation density when loaded long. I do not don't forget powder cost off the best of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps that's where I generally purpose to become. Within your situation utilizing h4831sc what you've (and what I should have carried out) I might start with the top in the bearing surface area of the bullet suitable in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you discover a velocity node.
If there is no load data it is actually mainly because this powder is just not ideal for this cartridge. Usually just one will not likely uncover just one powder to fit all cartridges, as well as household of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you will be asking about won't perform.
Although this is most likely h4831sc true, there's a great deal far more to it than simply not blowing yourself up. He couldn't hit prairie canine further than about 150 yards, so I'm guessing that inconsistent combustion wasn't undertaking anything favorable for his grouping capability with Those people loads.
Presently utilizing IMR 4831 within a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a well-liked option for this caliber and yields somewhat more velocity. Aside from it getting limited Lower, what's the difference in both of these powders, and will I swap to H4831sc?
The 55grs is all that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I think that they've slowed down the swift to point out that their rifles are superior. It bug the hell from me. I know superior. That is why I don't at any time throw out my older manuals. I do invest in new manual continuously to stay up on new chambers and there loading. I exploit this 39grs in summers @ 100+ levels without any challenges.
As for the 4831 vs 4831SC, They can be the same/identical powder cept for grain measurement. Load data is interchangeable.
Sure, You can utilize the same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, even so the SC version may possibly let you get a little extra in circumstances in which you are maxing h4831sc out circumstance quantity Using the typical powder before achieving pressure boundaries.
Several of the old Lyman data just listed IMR 4831, which was surplus military services powder and now newer mfg as H4831.
If I've a pound or two of the powder and receive more of exactly the same, only a special good deal variety, I will combine them all up in order that I have a homogeneous batch of powder with which to work.